gustavmahlerboard.com

General Category => Gustav Mahler and Related Discussions => Topic started by: stillivor on May 19, 2012, 06:27:38 AM

Title: 3 cycles - modern, historic and live - of the Gramophone-recommended
Post by: stillivor on May 19, 2012, 06:27:38 AM
To mark the 101st anniversary of our hero's death, The Gramophone recommends cycles and assumes it's opening a can of worms.

http://www.gramophone.co.uk/features/focus/gustav-mahler-on-disc-a-trio-of-symphony-cycles



    Ivor
Title: Re: 3 cycles - modern, historic and live - of the Gramophone-recommended
Post by: Michael on May 20, 2012, 04:01:06 PM
Well, why they recommend the Saraste M9 is totally beyond me.  It would be a performance worthy of consideration but for the very noticeable timpany errors (playing on the wrong beats) in the last part of the Rondo...
Title: Re: 3 cycles - modern, historic and live - of the Gramophone-recommended
Post by: John Kim on May 21, 2012, 07:11:11 PM
Well, why they recommend the Saraste M9 is totally beyond me.  It would be a performance worthy of consideration but for the very noticeable timpany errors (playing on the wrong beats) in the last part of the Rondo...
Agreed. But I'd have given 10/8 if it had not been for the timpani.

John
Title: Re: 3 cycles - modern, historic and live - of the Gramophone-recommended
Post by: barry guerrero on May 25, 2012, 03:48:26 AM
Historically, Gramophone reviewers can't be bothered with such petty details as having the right notes in the right place; correct rhythms, correct relative dynamics, etc. "Interpretation" hails supreme with them, which means presenting the music as it was actually written, simply won't do - unless, of course, we're talking about a so-called 'original' or 'historically informed' performance.