gustavmahlerboard.com

General Category => Gustav Mahler and Related Discussions => Topic started by: John Kim on November 16, 2011, 10:09:23 PM

Title: Rattle/BPO/EMI Mahler SACDs (issued in Japan)
Post by: John Kim on November 16, 2011, 10:09:23 PM
http://www.sa-cd.net/search/mahler+rattle

Looks like they are worth getting for the improved sound.

John
Title: Re: Rattle/BPO/EMI Mahler SACDs (issued in Japan)
Post by: Roland Flessner on November 18, 2011, 05:17:42 AM
I find that I like Rattle's Mahler less and less. When I survey recordings of a particular symphony, Rattle tends to get eliminated early, to the point where I am considering getting rid of all the Birmingham recordings I have. While I like the antiphonally divided violin sections, Rattle's gratuitous tempo changes break the momentum.

The PBO recordings I have--M5 and M9--seems somewhat better but are still jinxed. To my ears, the BPO is just wrong for Mahler: the sound is too blended, but Mahler is all counterpoint and the parts must register is discrete voices.
Title: Re: Rattle/BPO/EMI Mahler SACDs (issued in Japan)
Post by: John Kim on November 20, 2011, 05:30:15 PM
I find that I like Rattle's Mahler less and less. When I survey recordings of a particular symphony, Rattle tends to get eliminated early, to the point where I am considering getting rid of all the Birmingham recordings I have. While I like the antiphonally divided violin sections, Rattle's gratuitous tempo changes break the momentum.

The PBO recordings I have--M5 and M9--seems somewhat better but are still jinxed. To my ears, the BPO is just wrong for Mahler: the sound is too blended, but Mahler is all counterpoint and the parts must register is discrete voices.
I mostly agree.

But I still want to give them a chance with the SACD releases.

John
Title: Re: Rattle/BPO/EMI Mahler SACDs (issued in Japan)
Post by: Graf Danilo on November 21, 2011, 06:50:17 PM
I find that I like Rattle's Mahler less and less. When I survey recordings of a particular symphony, Rattle tends to get eliminated early, to the point where I am considering getting rid of all the Birmingham recordings I have. While I like the antiphonally divided violin sections, Rattle's gratuitous tempo changes break the momentum.

The PBO recordings I have--M5 and M9--seems somewhat better but are still jinxed. To my ears, the BPO is just wrong for Mahler: the sound is too blended, but Mahler is all counterpoint and the parts must register is discrete voices.

I attended early November Rattle's performance of the Ninth in Berlin, and to my ears the BPO seems to be in a state of wonder, only comparable to that of the Concertgebouw orchestra. In the last two seasons, I've heard  5 live performances of the Ninth: 2 under Abbado and the Lucerne forces, 1 with Haitink and the RCO, 1 with Gatti and the Wiener, and Rattle with the Berliner. I can assure you that Rattle's concert was quite an experience...
Title: Re: Rattle/BPO/EMI Mahler SACDs (issued in Japan)
Post by: barry guerrero on November 26, 2011, 12:49:08 AM
Just to play devil's advocate, I do think that the 9th is one of the Mahler symphonies that they nearly always do an excellent job with. They wouldn't be my first pick for M3 or M7 on most days. 50/50.