gustavmahlerboard.com

General Category => Gustav Mahler and Related Discussions => Topic started by: barry guerrero on February 20, 2013, 06:34:30 AM

Title: Dudamel/L.A.P.O. M9
Post by: barry guerrero on February 20, 2013, 06:34:30 AM
F.Y.I.

I think the new Dudamel M9 is terrific. The last movement has an incredible climax to it, while the slower, 'zen like' moments are not only slow in tempo, but also incredible soft and gentle. I'm really impressed. The solo first horn is the best I've head since Barry Tuckwell on Solti's mid '60s L.S.O. 9th. What a pleasant surprise.
Title: Re: Dudamel/L.A.P.O. M9
Post by: Leo K on November 28, 2013, 08:56:50 PM
I just bought this today, really looking forward to hearing it.

--Todd
Title: Re: Dudamel/L.A.P.O. M9
Post by: John Kim on November 29, 2013, 05:07:16 AM
Sorry but I am not all that hot about Dudamel's M9th.

It is as if his grasp of the music hasn't ripened enough; nothing really is special about the recording. Even the orchestra sounds uninvolved, although they play well technically.

I'd give 7/9 for the performance/sound.
Title: Re: Dudamel/L.A.P.O. M9
Post by: barry guerrero on November 30, 2013, 12:28:00 AM
It could use a bigger tam-tam smash at the climax of the first movement. But other than that, it's very much to my liking. I think the last movement is really good. For me, the best one since Karajan (maybe Bertini too). It might be just a tad 'distant' and 'cool' (whatever that means). But then again, so is the piece.  I would rate it 10/8 (maybe 9.5/8)
Title: Re: Dudamel/L.A.P.O. M9
Post by: Leo K on November 30, 2013, 12:49:11 AM
Thanks Barry and John for your thoughts. I'm hoping to get to this tonight or tomorrow. I also got Pappano's M6 to hear.

--Todd
Title: Re: Dudamel/L.A.P.O. M9
Post by: Leo K on December 03, 2013, 04:59:18 PM
I’ve now heard this recording, and it is impressive on first hearing, but I’m going to need more listens to really see if I like it or not. I am disappointed the third climax in the first movement is not heard very well, it sounds lame.

--Todd