gustavmahlerboard.com
General Category => Gustav Mahler and Related Discussions => Topic started by: barry guerrero on May 23, 2007, 02:30:43 PM
-
The following link has a pretty well written review of each performance at this year's Mahler cycle with the Staatskapelle Berlin (Barenboim and Boulez). Obviously, the reviewer very much liked what he heard. FYI.
http://boulezian.blogspot.com/search/label/Mahler
-
The reviewer quoted one of those statements that makes no sense, yet sounds profound:
At the same time, both would probably agree with Theodor Adorno, who, in his essay Tradition, writes: ‘The difference between what is past and what is present … is not absolute. One can only understand Schoenberg if one understands Bach; one can only understand Bach if one understands Schoenberg.’
The part about understanding Bach only if you understand Schoenberg is the part that makes no sense to me. I guess that means Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, Brahms, et al did not understand Bach? Maybe even Bach himself did not understand Bach? ::)
-
Go get 'em, Damfino!
It is not widely known that Adorno wrote in his sleep, using the wrong end of the pencil. ;D
. & '
-
I find it best to stear a wide path around Adorno's writings.