Here is it
http://www.classicstodayfrance.com/review.asp?ReviewNum=3688well, I don't quite agree with the reviewer's small reservations (btw, on an extramusical note, I'm there all years but I can't quite see all that extreme glamour...there are VIPs for sure, but everything is very relaxed compared to the retard, disgustingly gossipped glamour of the Scala Opening, to name one ("mrs VIP no.1 is wearing this, mrs VIP no.2 is there without her husband, what?! Berlusconi isn't there this time...oh, on a sidenote, there will be music performed later tonight in case you are remotely interested"). I like my Mahler to flow naturally, I don't need the conductor to try to be interesting at all costs (cough cough...Dudamel...cough). A matter of taste, ofc...
But I can't stop wondering...why does he insist (this is not the first time) about an already released Lucerne Ninth? This puts a tiny shadow on his credibility, as there simply isn't any Lucerne Ninth so far, there will be one in some days (a concert I'm eagerly waiting for) but we won't see it on DVD/Bluray till the next year. What we have is a Rome Ninth, which is a nice performance marred (IMHO) by so-so sound which ruins the whole by a not negligeable amount (on this regard I agree with Hurwitz, something I don't do often regarding Abbado's recent Mahler recordings)...