Author Topic: M3 Czech Philharmonic Orchestra /Zdenek Mácal Exton review  (Read 7888 times)

Offline Russ Smiley

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 239
Russ Smiley

Offline barry guerrero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3928
Re: M3 Czech Philharmonic Orchestra /Zdenek Mácal Exton review
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2010, 05:51:53 AM »
I think the Kobayashi/Czech Phil. Mahler 3 is far more intense. But the Macal is better recorded, and Remmert is always outstanding. Still, I'd go with the Kobayashi.

Barry

Offline John Kim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2630
Re: M3 Czech Philharmonic Orchestra /Zdenek Mácal Exton review
« Reply #2 on: May 07, 2010, 05:55:45 AM »
I think the Kobayashi/Czech Phil. Mahler 3 is far more intense. But the Macal is better recorded, and Remmert is always outstanding. Still, I'd go with the Kobayashi.

Barry
I think the Kobayashi is better recorded. It's one of the best sounding Mahler recordings ever. It's also an excellent interpretation.

John,

Offline alpsman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Re: M3 Czech Philharmonic Orchestra /Zdenek Mácal Exton review
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2010, 11:36:39 PM »
Not hear the Kobayashi yet.

But I have listened Macal and found this performance very good, until the last 3-4 minutes where the ecstasis and exaltation are not there.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk