JOHANNES BRAHMS
Symphonies Nos. 1-4
Berlin Philharmonic
Simon Rattle
EMI- 2 67254 2(CD)
Reference Recording - Jochum (DG); Abbado (DG); Levine (RCA); Klemperer (EMI)
rating 7/8
The playing of the Berlin Philharmonic in this new Brahms cycle is gorgeous, with sumptuous strings, and, thanks to one of the better EMI recordings from this source, plenty of necessary woodwind detail. Only slightly dry, wooden timpani let the show down a bit, but it's not a big deal. The performances are also mostly very good. The first movement of the First symphony could be more exciting, but the rest of the symphony goes splendidly--the slow movement glows, and the finale is rousingly grand. The Second, like the First, has no exposition repeat in the first movement, and we don't miss it. Simon Rattle leads an aptly flowing, lyrical performance lacking only that extra ounce of bounce in the finale to set the seal on what otherwise is a very fine reading.
As so often happens in Brahms cycles, the Third symphony misfires. The first movement is heavy and sluggish, and in the finale Rattle imposes his own "ideas" on the music, not all of them good (check out the ridiculous subito piano-crescendo after the big central climax). The Fourth, though, is mostly fine, save for a slightly languorous first movement that nevertheless rouses itself to deliver an impressive coda. The second movement doesn't drag, the scherzo has plenty of verve, and the orchestra's playing in the final passacaglia is truly stellar (you won't hear a better flute solo anywhere).
But let's not kid ourselves. This is still second-rate compared to Jochum (mono) with this same orchestra, Abbado (arguably his finest achievement in Berlin), or Karajan's last cycle. In other words, if your principal reason for acquiring this set is to hear the Berlin Philharmonic in music it ought to play as well or better than anyone, you have plenty of superb options. So then the question becomes whether or not Rattle offers enough insight to justify hearing this music primarily in order to discover his way with it. The answer is "no"; he's not bad, but he's not great either, and why settle for less?
--David Hurwitz