Barry, the suggestion of M2 for Easter is simply ideally appropriate.
Many contemporary critics of Mahler complained about his sentimentality. But I believe they were confusing sentimentality with the courage to go ahead and address topics where many fear to tread.
In the March, 2010 issue (Mahler sesquicentennial) of Grammophone, Mariss Jansons has an essay on M2, where he defends Mahler's courage about putting "for himself and for listeners the big questions. What is life? Why are we living? What will be next? Is there an afterlife?"
For many of us here at the Mahlerboard, this is exactly why we are attracted to Mahler. Yes, the music is beautiful, but there are beautiful ideas to contemplate also.
I applaud your willingness to bring up the Resurrection Symphony at Easter, just as Mahler would not flinch even amid charges that he was being naive, simplistic, or sentimental. It is the courage to confront and think about our mortality, God, and afterlife that sets apart many Mahlerians from the rest of the musical world.
Happy Easter to all,
--John Haueisen