Author Topic: The BEST Mahler 7?  (Read 16524 times)

Offline AZContrabassoon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
The BEST Mahler 7?
« on: February 29, 2016, 10:25:58 PM »
Recently, the new Maazel recording of symphonies 7, 8 & 9 with the Philharmonia was released on Signum. Classics Today and Music Web were merciless in trashing the 7th - slow, dull, boring. A waste of time and money.

Now today the March/April copy of American Record Review shows up and there on page 118: "7 is probably the best available now". Better than Bernstein? Abaddo? Kondrashin? Kubelik? The reviewer then goes on to praise the 9th as one of the best ever alongside Giulini and Karajan. The 8th is good - but he thinks the Maazel/Vienna better.

Anyway, has anyone heard this 7th? He does compare it favorably to Klemperer, which I find utterly dreadful.

Offline barry guerrero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3928
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #1 on: February 29, 2016, 11:50:08 PM »
Maazel's late Mahler is extremely slow - a style that may be more appropriate for Bruckner than Mahler. He is, however, a master of powerful climaxes. If that works for you, then maybe give it a try. Personally, I don't like M7 to be slow in the second half. Movements 1 and 2?   .    .    .   yeah, OK - as long as they're done well, i.e. sans flabby rhythms. Another strike for me is that I'm not a fan of the modern day Philharmonia in Mahler, or much of anything else for that matter.

Of the major London orchestras, when it comes to Mahler, I like the LSO in a sort of lean 'racing car' kind of way, while the LPO probably still retains something of a heavier sound that's more appropriate for Austro/German music. I'm still not a fan of the metallic 'whang-y' sounding Paiste tam-tams used ubiquitously in the UK (Paiste uses stainless steel in the alloy).
« Last Edit: March 01, 2016, 12:16:01 AM by barry guerrero »

Offline James Meckley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 612
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2016, 07:16:12 AM »
Anyway, has anyone heard this 7th? He does compare it favorably to Klemperer, which I find utterly dreadful.

This Mahler 7 on Signum Classics from 2011 is quite similar interpretively to Maazel's NYPO recording from four years earlier (just one minute shorter overall) but it's more naturally recorded—the engineers have to get in fairly close at David Geffen Hall to minimize it's sonic signature. As Barry anticipated, it's on the slow side, though it comes nowhere near the creaky perversity of Klemperer's version on EMI. I prefer M7 with more energy and forward thrust, especially in the Finale.

"Probably the best available now"? I hardly think so. You can add Gramophone to your list of publications that have panned it. Fanfare so far has been silent on the matter.

James
"We cannot see how any of his music can long survive him."
Henry Krehbiel, New York Tribune obituary of Gustav Mahler

Offline barry guerrero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3928
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2016, 11:58:01 PM »
I have 'spot checked' the Maazel/Signum recordings on Spotify (no pun intended). These are simply not for me. My thought is that if one wants a slower and very 'powerful' type of M7 recording, it would be very difficult to better the last 'live' one that Tennstedt made for EMI. It came in a 3 cd box set of both M6 and M7. I felt that Tennstedt's approach better suited the 6th symphony, but both were still very good in that late Tennstedt style. Now Warner Classics (formerly EMI) has issued a box set with both the EMI studio and live recordings. This appears to be a pretty good deal.

http://www.amazon.com/Mahler-Complete-Symphonies-Gustav/dp/B004OGDW4M/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1456876553&sr=1-1&keywords=mahler+box+tennstedt


http://www.amazon.com/Mahler-Symphonies-6-7-Gustav/dp/B000005GLL/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1456876511&sr=1-1&keywords=mahler+6+and+7+tennstedt

Offline barry guerrero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3928
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2016, 06:03:00 AM »
Another very good M7 along the same lines is the Leif Segerstam/Danish R.S.O. one on Chandos. A bit slow; very powerful, and with careful attention to Mahler's deliberate sound effects.

According to Wikipedia, Segerstam has composed 291 symphonies!!!

Offline waderice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 649
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2016, 12:40:35 PM »
According to Wikipedia, Segerstam has composed 291 symphonies!!!

Each one must last five minutes or less!  ;D

Wade

Offline AZContrabassoon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2016, 03:13:49 PM »
I recall a review of a disk which contained several of his symphonies. The reviewer concluded saying something like "For the orchestra 5 stars, for the composer - zero!" He's a fine conductor, though. His Sibelius is brilliant. Have you seen the video of him doing Sheherazade, though? What he does in the finale is astonishing.

Offline waderice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 649
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2016, 03:37:19 PM »
Have you seen the video of him doing Sheherazade, though? What he does in the finale is astonishing.

Link?

Thanks, Wade

Offline AZContrabassoon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2016, 03:15:24 PM »

Offline justininsf

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 91
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2016, 05:48:40 PM »

Offline waderice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 649
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2016, 06:41:44 PM »
Here it is:

http://slippedisc.com/2015/12/maestro-lets-rip-in-mid-concert/

When I saw "maestro lets rip in mid-concert", I didn't expect him, and some of the other orchestra players to holler out during the music playing.  I had in mind, something else "let rip" during one of the quiet passages!   ;D

Wade

Offline barry guerrero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3928
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2016, 11:51:08 PM »
He obviously feels that adding a 'soundtrack' of crowd noise enhances the narrative to the story - not really an effort to play faster. In fact, this is not a particularly fast tempo for the finale. Good tam-tam smash at 47:13 (which is often times underplayed or inaudible).

Hey, have you folks seen the prices for Segerstam's Mahler at Amazon!?!!    .   .   .  and the complete box set isn't even listed!

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Dpopular&field-keywords=mahler+segerstam&rh=n%3A5174%2Ck%3Amahler+segerstam


Here's the complete cycle for a mere $485

http://www.cduniverse.com/search/xx/music/pid/1013115/a/mahler%3A+symphonies+no+1+-+10+%2F+leif+segerstam,+et+al.htm

« Last Edit: March 07, 2016, 12:03:17 AM by barry guerrero »

Offline ChrisH

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2016, 12:21:10 AM »

Offline AZContrabassoon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2016, 09:32:29 PM »
Ouch! Now I really regret not having bought them all 20 years ago. I did get 3, 7 & 9 - they're fine. Even $100 or so for the download is really steep considering the great sets available for $50 or less. I imagine someday this entire set will be brought out as a bargain box.

Offline David Boxwell

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: The BEST Mahler 7?
« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2016, 09:42:29 PM »
The one, the only Kirill Kondrashin (at the Concertgebouw, Nov 29 1979)!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk