The first concert which occurred Saturday evening (5/16) didn't go all that well, mainly because the orchestra wasn't quite warmed up yet. In particular, the percussionists missed many entries and even placed cymbal and tam tam strokes at wrong spots (in the coda, for example). But the singing was excellent. More importantly, the acoustics at IKEA Performing Arts Hall were not well suited for this mammoth work.
However, the second concert on Sunday at a different hall could have not improved better
.
Not only the orchestra played very well (how do I know this? Because I was sitting in the audience for the first two movts.) making hardly any mistakes, it sounded full and rich, almost like a professional orchestra. More importantly, the acoustics were far better than at the IKEA hall. I am sure the musicians were also encouraged by the improved sound of themselves.
The chorus had actually pretty good number of members participating from Seattle Symphony Chorus, so no wonder the audience praised our singing. I had some difficulty following the high notes near the end, but managed to come through.
Standing at the back of the orchestra, it was difficult to hear the true integrated sound of the orchestra; it was mostly the brass and low strings my ears were picking. But when I sat among the audience I realized how good a band this orchestra really is. Had we performed a third concert it would have been close to what Seattle Symphony could have done.
I read a report that some audiences were crying at the end. That's a good indication of the excellence of the Mahler Second concert
.
Regards,
John,